Comparison with 1872 |
|
deposits. In the case of an extensive and shallow sea, such as that within a large part of the Malay Archipelago, where the depth varies from 30 or 40 to 60 fathoms, a widely extended formation might be formed during a period of elevation
and yet not suffer excessively from denudation during its slow upheaval; but the thickness of the formation could not be great, for owing to the elevatory movement it would be less than the depth,
supposed to be shallow;
the deposit would not generally
be much consolidated, nor would it
be capped by overlying
formations, so that it would run a good chance of being worn away during
subsequent oscillations of level. It has
been
suggested by Mr. Hopkins, that if one part of the area, after rising and before being denuded, subsided, the deposit formed during the rising movement, though not thick, might become
protected by fresh accumulations, and thus be preserved for an extremely long period,— a consideration which I formerly overlooked.
|
|
Mr. Hopkins,
in commenting on this subject, states that he believes the entire destruction of any
sedimentary bed
of considerable horizontal extent to
have been of rare occurrence. But all geologists, excepting the few who believe that our present metamorphic schists and plutonic rocks once formed the primordial nucleus of the globe, will
....... 1869 1872 | probably 1866 |
admit that
these latter rocks these latter rocks 1869 1872 |
rocks of this nature must 1866 |
have been
stript of their covering to stript of their covering to 1872 |
denuded on 1866 1869 |
an enormous
extent. extent. 1872 | scale. 1866 1869 |
↑4 blocks not present in 1859 1860 1866 1869 1872; present in 1861 | My remarks apply solely to beds rich in fossils: I have admitted that sediment accumulated in extremely thick, solid, or extensive masses would escape denudation.
The point in question is, whether widely extended formations, rich in fossils, and of sufficient thickness to last for a long period, would be formed except during periods of subsidence?
My impression is that this has rarely been the case.
As the subject of complete denudation has been broached by Mr. Hopkins, I may remark that all geologists, excepting the few who believe that they see in the metamorphic schists and plutonic rocks the heated primordial nucleus of the globe, will probably admit that rocks of this nature must have been largely denuded.
|
For it is scarcely possible that
such such 1869 1872 | these 1861 1866 |
rocks should
have been solidified and crystallized in a naked condition;
but if the metamorphic action occurred at profound depths of the ocean, the former
protecting mantle of rock protecting mantle of rock 1869 1872 |
mantle 1861 |
protecting mantle 1866 |
may not have been thick. Admitting then that
...OMIT 1869 1872 |
such rocks as 1861 1866 |
gneiss, mica-schist, granite, diorite, &c,
were once necessarily covered up, how can we account for the extensive
and naked
areas of such rocks in many parts of the world, except on the belief that they have subsequently been
|
deposits. In the case of an extensive and shallow sea, such as that within a large part of the Malay Archipelago, where the depth varies from 30 or 40 to 60 fathoms, a widely extended formation might be formed during a period of
elevation, elevation, 1866 1869 1872 | elevation 1861 |
and yet not suffer excessively from denudation during its slow upheaval; but the thickness of the formation could not be great, for owing to the elevatory movement it would be less than the
depth depth 1866 1869 1872 | depth, 1861 |
in which it was formed; nor would in which it was formed; nor would 1866 1869 1872 |
supposed to be shallow; 1861 |
the deposit
...OMIT 1866 1869 1872 |
would not generally 1861 |
be much consolidated, nor
....... 1866 1869 1872 | would it 1861 |
be capped by
overlying overlying 1861 1866 1872 | over- lying 1869 |
formations, so that it would run a good chance of being worn away
by atmospheric degradation and by the action of the sea during by atmospheric degradation and by the action of the sea during 1866 1869 1872 |
during 1861 |
subsequent oscillations of level. It
has, has, 1866 1869 1872 | has 1861 |
however, been however, been 1866 1869 1872 | been 1861 |
suggested by Mr. Hopkins, that if one part of the area, after rising and before being denuded, subsided, the deposit formed during the rising movement, though not thick, might
afterwards become afterwards become 1866 1869 1872 | become 1861 |
protected by fresh accumulations, and thus be preserved for
a long period. a long period. 1866 1869 1872 |
an extremely long period,— a consideration which I formerly overlooked. 1861 |
|
|
Mr.
Hopkins Hopkins 1866 1869 1872 | Hopkins, 1861 |
also expresses his belief that also expresses his belief that 1866 1869 1872 |
in commenting on this subject, states that he believes the entire destruction of any 1861 |
sedimentary
beds beds 1866 1869 1872 | bed 1861 |
of considerable horizontal extent
....... 1866 1869 1872 | to 1861 |
have
rarely been completely destroyed. rarely been completely destroyed. 1866 1869 1872 |
been of rare occurrence. 1861 |
But all geologists, excepting the few who believe that our present metamorphic schists and plutonic rocks once formed the primordial nucleus of the globe, will
probably probably 1866 | probably 1869 1872 |
admit that
rocks of this nature must rocks of this nature must 1866 |
these latter rocks 1869 1872 |
have been
denuded on denuded on 1866 1869 |
stript of their covering to 1872 |
an enormous
scale. scale. 1866 1869 | extent. 1872 |
↑4 blocks not present in 1859 1860 1866 1869 1872; present in 1861 | My remarks apply solely to beds rich in fossils: I have admitted that sediment accumulated in extremely thick, solid, or extensive masses would escape denudation.
The point in question is, whether widely extended formations, rich in fossils, and of sufficient thickness to last for a long period, would be formed except during periods of subsidence?
My impression is that this has rarely been the case.
As the subject of complete denudation has been broached by Mr. Hopkins, I may remark that all geologists, excepting the few who believe that they see in the metamorphic schists and plutonic rocks the heated primordial nucleus of the globe, will probably admit that rocks of this nature must have been largely denuded.
|
For it is scarcely possible that
these these 1861 1866 | such 1869 1872 |
rocks
could could 1866 1869 1872 | should 1861 |
have been solidified and crystallized
whilst uncovered; whilst uncovered; 1866 1869 1872 |
in a naked condition; 1861 |
but if the metamorphic action occurred at profound depths of the ocean, the former
protecting mantle protecting mantle 1866 |
mantle 1861 |
protecting mantle of rock 1869 1872 |
may not have been
very thick. very thick. 1866 1869 1872 | thick. 1861 |
Admitting then that
such rocks as such rocks as 1861 1866 |
OMIT 1869 1872 |
gneiss, mica-schist, granite, diorite,
&c., &c., 1866 1869 1872 | &c, 1861 |
were once necessarily covered up, how can we account for the
naked naked 1866 1869 1872 | extensive 1861 |
and
extensive extensive 1866 1869 1872 | naked 1861 |
areas of such rocks in many parts of the world, except on the belief that they have subsequently been
|