will it be with each subordinate branch of descendants, at each successive
stage. | stage. 1869 1872 | | period. 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
If, however, we
suppose any | suppose any 1869 1872 |
| choose to suppose that any of the 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
descendant | descendant 1869 1872 | | descendants 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
of
A | A 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 | | A, 1872 |
or of
I to have been | I to have been 1869 |
| I have been 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
| I, to have become 1872 |
so much modified as to have
lost all | lost all 1869 1872 |
| more or less completely lost 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
traces of
its | its 1869 1872 | | their 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
parentage, in this case,
its | its 1869 1872 | | their 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
place | place 1869 1872 | | places 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
in
the | the 1869 1872 | | a 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
natural
system | system 1869 1872 | | classification 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
will
likewise be lost,— as | likewise be lost,— as 1869 |
| have been more or less completely lost,— as sometimes 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
| be lost, as 1872 |
seems to have occurred with
some few existing | some few existing 1869 1872 |
| existing 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
organisms. All the descendants of the genus F, along its whole line of descent, are supposed to have been but little modified, and they
..| ..... 1869 1872 | | yet 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
form a single genus. ↑| 3 blocks not present in 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869; present in 1872 | | But this genus, though much isolated, will still occupy its proper intermediate position.
The representation of the groups, as here given in the diagram on a flat surface, is much too simple.
The branches ought to have diverged in all directions.
|
But this genus, though much isolated, will still occupy its proper intermediate
position. | position. 1869 | | position; 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
..| ..... 1869 | | for 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
..| ..... 1869 | | F 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
..| ..... 1869 | | originally 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
..| ..... 1869 | | was 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
..| ..... 1869 | | intermediate 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
..| ..... 1869 | | in 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
..| ..... 1869 | | character 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
..| ..... 1869 | | between 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
..| ..... 1869 | | A 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
..| ..... 1869 | | and 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
..| ..... 1869 | | I, 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
..| ..... 1869 | | and 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
..| ..... 1869 | | the 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
..| ..... 1869 | | several 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
..| ..... 1869 | | genera 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
..| ..... 1869 | | descended 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
..| ..... 1869 | | from 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
..| ..... 1869 | | these 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
..| ..... 1869 | | two 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
..| ..... 1869 | | genera 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
..| ..... 1869 | | will 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
..| ..... 1869 | | have 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
..| ..... 1869 | | inherited 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
..| ..... 1869 | | to 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
..| ..... 1869 | | a 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
..| ..... 1869 | | certain 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
..| ..... 1869 | | extent 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
..| ..... 1869 | | their 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
..| ..... 1869 | | characters. 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
This natural arrangement is
shown | shown 1869 | | shown, 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
in the diagram as | in the diagram as 1869 |
| as 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
far as is possible on paper,
...| OMIT 1869 |
| in the diagram, 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
but in much too simple a manner. If
a branching diagram had not been used, and only | a branching diagram had not been used, and only 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |
| OMIT 1872 |
the names of the groups had been
written | written 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |
| simply written down 1872 |
in a linear series,
it | it 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 | | the representation 1872 |
would have been still less
possible to have given a natural arrangement; | possible to have given a natural arrangement; 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |
| natural; 1872 |
and it is notoriously not possible to represent in a series, on a flat surface, the affinities which we discover in nature amongst the beings of the same group. Thus,
on | on 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 | on 1872 |
the
view which I hold, the | view which I hold, the 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |
| OMIT 1872 |
natural system is genealogical in its
arrangement, | arrangement, 1859 1860 1861 1869 1872 | | arrange- ment, 1866 |
like a
pedigree; | pedigree; 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 | | pedigree: 1872 |
but the
amount | amount 1869 1872 | | degrees 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
of modification which the different groups have
undergone | undergone 1869 1872 | | undergone, 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
has | has 1869 1872 | | have 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
to be expressed by ranking them under different so-called genera, sub-families, families, sections, orders, and classes. |
It may be worth while to illustrate this view of classification, by taking the case of languages. If we possessed a perfect pedigree of mankind, a genealogical arrangement of the races of man would afford the best classification of the various languages now spoken throughout the world; and if all extinct languages, and all intermediate and slowly changing dialects,
had | had 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 | | were 1872 |
to be included, such an arrangement
would | would 1861 1866 1869 1872 | | would, 1859 1860 |
..| ..... 1861 1866 1869 1872 | | I think, 1859 1860 |
be the only possible one. Yet it might be that some
ancient languages had altered very | ancient languages had altered very 1869 1872 |
| very ancient language had altered 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
little | little 1869 1872 | | little, 1859 1860 1861 1866 |
and had given rise to few
|