Darwin Online
Publications
Manuscripts
Biography
Media
About Us
Advanced search

See page in:
1859
1860
1861
1866
1869
1872

Compare with:
1859
1860
1861
1866
1872

→ had altered much owing 1869 1872
(owing 1859 1860 1861 1866
→ races, 1869 1872
from a common race) had altered much, 1859 1860 1861
from a common stock) had altered much, 1866
→ the species, with the 1869 1872
species, with 1859 1860 1861 1866
→ the varieties; and in some cases, as with domestic pigeons, 1869
varieties; and with our domestic productions, 1859 1860 1861 1866
the varieties; and in some cases, as with the domestic pigeon, with 1872
↑ 1 blocks not present in 1869 1872; present in 1859 1860 1861 1866
The origin of the existence of groups subordinate to groups, is the same with varieties as with species, namely, closeness of descent with various degrees of modification.
→ as in classifying 1869 1872
in classifying varieties, as with 1859 1860 1861 1866
new languages, whilst others →had altered much owing to the
spreading
spreading,
and subsequent
....
isolation,
isolation
and
states
state
of civilisation of the several
races,
....
descended
co-descended
→races, and had
given
thus given
rise to many new
languages
dialects
and
dialects.
languages.
The various degrees of difference
in
between
the languages
from
of
the same stock, would have to be expressed by groups subordinate to groups; but the proper or even
the only
only
possible arrangement would still be genealogical; and this would be strictly natural, as it would connect together all languages, extinct and
modern,
recent,
by the closest affinities, and would give the filiation and origin of each tongue.
In confirmation of this view, let us glance at the classification of varieties, which are
known
believed
or
believed
known
to
have
be
descended from
one
a single
species. These are grouped under →the species, with the sub-varieties under →the varieties; and in some cases, as with domestic pigeons, several other grades of
difference.
difference
are
are
requisite,
requisite.
requisite.
as
OMIT
....
we
OMIT
....
have
OMIT
....
seen
OMIT
....
with
OMIT
....
pigeons.
OMIT
....
↑ Nearly the same rules are followed →as in classifying species. Authors have insisted on the necessity of
classing
arranging
varieties on a natural instead of an artificial system; we are cautioned, for instance, not to class two varieties of the pine-apple together, merely because their fruit, though the most important part, happens to be nearly identical; no one puts the
swedish
Swedish
and common
turnip
turnips
together, though the esculent and thickened stems are so similar. Whatever part is found to be most constant, is used in classing varieties: thus the great agriculturist Marshall says the horns are very useful for this purpose with cattle, because they are less variable than the shape or colour of the body, &c.; whereas with sheep the horns are much less serviceable, because less constant. In classing
varieties;
varieties,
I apprehend
if
that if
we had a real pedigree, a genealogical classification would be universally
preferred;
preferred:
and it has been attempted
by
in
some
authors.
cases.
For we might feel sure,