Origin of Species Variorum

Comparison with 1861

and animals; or that the poison secreted by the gall-fly produces monstrous growths on the wild rose or oak-tree. In all organic beings the union of a male and female elemental cell seems occasionally to be necessary for the production of a new being. ↑ In all, as far as is at present known, the germinal vesicle is the same. So that every individual organic being starts from a common origin. If we look even to the two main divisions— namely, to the animal and vegetable kingdoms— certain low forms are so far intermediate in character that naturalists have disputed to which kingdom they should be referred, and, as Professor Asa Gray has remarked, "the spores and other reproductive bodies of many of the lower algæ may claim to have first a characteristically animal, and then an unequivocally vegetable existence." Therefore I should infer from analogy that probably all the organic beings which have ever lived on this earth have descended from some such low and intermediate form, both animals and plants may have been developed; and, if we admit this, we must admit that all the organic beings which have ever lived on this earth may have descended from some one primordial form, into which life was first breathed. ↑ The case is different with the members of each great class, as the Vertebrata, the Articulata, &c.; for here, as I have just remarked, we have in the laws of homology and embryology, &c.; distinct evidence that all have descended from a single parent.

When the views entertained in this volume on the origin of species, or when analogous views are generally admitted, we can dimly foresee that there will be a

and animals; or that the poison secreted by the gallfly produces monstrous growths on the wild rose or oak-tree. ↑ With all organic beings sexual reproduction seems to be essentially similar. With all, as far as is at present known, the germinal vesicle is the same; so that all organisms start from a common origin. If we look even to the two main divisions— namely, to the animal, and vegetable kingdoms— certain low forms are so far intermediate in character that naturalists have disputed to which kingdom they should be referred, and, as Professor Asa Gray has remarked, "the spores and other reproductive bodies of many of the lower algæ? may claim to have first a characteristically animal, and then an unequivocally vegetable existence." Therefore, on the principle of natural selection with divergence of character, it does not seem incredible that, from some such low and intermediate form, both animals and plants may have been developed; and, if we admit this, we must likewise admit that all the organic beings which have ever lived on this earth may be descended from some one primordial form. .. .. .. .. .. ... But this inference is chiefly grounded on analogy, and it is immaterial whether or not it be accepted. No doubt it is possible, as Mr. G. H. Lewes has urged, that at the first commencement of life many different forms were evolved; but if so, we may conclude that only a very few have left modified descendants. For, as I have recently remarked in regard to the members of each great class, such as the Vertebrata, Articulata, &c., we have distinct evidence in their embryological, homologous and rudimentary structures, that within each class all are descended from a single progenitor.

When the views advanced by me in this volume, and by Mr. Wallace in the Linnean Journal, or when analogous views on the origin of species are generally admitted, we can dimly foresee that there will be a