Comparison with 1861 |
|
the larger domestic animals tends, I think, to mislead us: we see no great destruction falling on them, and
we forget
that thousands are annually slaughtered for food, and that in a state of nature an equal number would have somehow to be disposed of. |
|
The only difference between organisms which annually produce eggs or seeds by the thousand, and those which produce extremely few, is, that the slow-breeders would require a few more years to people, under favourable conditions, a whole district, let it be ever so large. The condor lays a couple of eggs and the ostrich a score, and yet in the same country the condor may be the more numerous of the two:
the Fulmar petrel lays but one egg, yet it is believed to be the most numerous bird in the world. One fly deposits hundreds of eggs, and another, like the hippobosca, a single one; but this difference does not determine how many individuals of the two species can be supported in a district. A large number of eggs is of some importance to those species,
which depend on a rapidly
fluctuating amount of food, for it allows them rapidly to increase in number. But the real importance of a large number of eggs or seeds is to make up for much destruction at some period of life; and this period in the great majority of cases is an early one. If an animal can in any way protect its own eggs or young, a small number may be produced, and yet the average stock be fully kept up; but if many eggs or young are destroyed, many must be produced, or the species will become extinct. It would suffice to keep up the full number of a tree, which lived on an average for a thousand years, if a single seed were produced once in a thousand years, supposing that this seed were never destroyed, and could be ensured to germinate in a fitting place. So
that that 1859 1860 1861 | that, 1866 1869 1872 |
in all cases, the average
|
the larger domestic animals tends, I think, to mislead us: we see no great destruction falling on them,
and and 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 | but 1872 |
we
forget forget 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 |
do not keep in mind 1872 |
that thousands are annually slaughtered for food, and that in a state of nature an equal number would have somehow to be disposed of. |
|
The only difference between organisms which annually produce eggs or seeds by the thousand, and those which produce extremely few, is, that the slow-breeders would require a few more years to people, under favourable conditions, a whole district, let it be ever so large. The condor lays a couple of eggs and the ostrich a score, and yet in the same country the condor may be the more numerous of the
two: two: 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 | two; 1872 |
the Fulmar petrel lays but one egg, yet it is believed to be the most numerous bird in the world. One fly deposits hundreds of eggs, and another, like the hippobosca, a single one; but this difference does not determine how many individuals of the two species can be supported in a district. A large number of eggs is of some importance to those
species species 1860 1861 1866 1869 1872 | species, 1859 |
which depend on a
rapidly rapidly 1859 1860 1861 1866 1869 | rapidly 1872 |
fluctuating amount of food, for it allows them rapidly to increase in number. But the real importance of a large number of eggs or seeds is to make up for much destruction at some period of life; and this period in the great majority of cases is an early one. If an animal can in any way protect its own eggs or young, a small number may be produced, and yet the average stock be fully kept up; but if many eggs or young are destroyed, many must be produced, or the species will become extinct. It would suffice to keep up the full number of a tree, which lived on an average for a thousand years, if a single seed were produced once in a thousand years, supposing that this seed were never destroyed, and could be ensured to germinate in a fitting place. So
that, that, 1866 1869 1872 | that 1859 1860 1861 |
in all cases, the average
|