from their following exactly
the same habits of life with their parents; for in this case, it would be indispensable for the
existence of
the
species, that the child
should be modified at a very early age
in the same manner with its parents, in accordance with their similar habits.
↑1 blocks not present in 1859 1860 1861 1869; present in 1866 1872 | Again, with respect to the singular fact of so
many terrestrial and fresh-water animals not
undergoing
any metamorphosis, whilst the
marine members of the same classes
pass through various transformations, Fritz Müller
has suggested that if
an animal during a long succession of generations had to change its habits from living
in the sea
to living on the land or in fresh-water, it
would be a
great
advantage to its descendants during their modification if they were to lose their metamorphoses;
for it is not probable that places well adapted for both the larval and mature stages, under such new and greatly changed habits of life, could
be
found unoccupied or ill-occupied by other organisms.
|
Some further explanation, however, of the embryo not undergoing any metamorphosis is perhaps requisite. If, on the other hand, it profited the young to
follow habits of life in any degree
different from those of their parent,
and consequently to be constructed in
a slightly different manner,
then,
on the principle of inheritance at corresponding ages, the active
young or larvæ might easily
be rendered by natural selection different to any conceivable extent
from their parents. Such
differences
might,
also, become correlated with successive stages of development;
so that the larvæ,
in the first stage, might differ
greatly from the larvæ
in the second stage, as we have seen to be
the case with cirripedes. The adult might become
fitted for sites or habits, in which organs of locomotion or of the senses, &c., would be useless; and in this case the final
metamorphosis would be said to be
retrograde. ↑3 blocks not present in 1859 1860 1861 1869 1872; present in 1866 | If, on the other hand, it profited the young to follow habits of life in any slight degree different from those of their parents and consequently to be constructed in a slightly different manner, or if it profited larvæ already having different habits from their parents to change still further their habits, then, on the principle of inheritance at corresponding ages, the young or the larvæ might be rendered by natural selection more and more different from their parents to any conceivable extent.
Differences in the larvæ might, also, become correlated with successive stages of development; so that the larvæ in the first stage, might come to differ greatly from the larvæ in the second stage, as is the case with so many animals.
The adult might also become fitted for sites or habits, in which the organs of locomotion or of the senses, &c., would be useless; and in this case the final metamorphosis would be said to be retrograde.
|
↑1 blocks not present in 1859 1860 1861; present in 1866 1869 1872 | From the remarks above
made we can see how by alterations
of structure in the young, in conformity with altered
habits of life, together with inheritance at corresponding ages, the metamorphoses of certain animals might first have been acquired, and subsequently transmitted to numerous modified descendants. |
|
As all the organic beings, extinct and recent, which have ever lived
on this earth have to be classed together,
and as all have
been connected by the finest
gradations, the best, or indeed,
if our collections were nearly perfect, the only possible arrangement, would be genealogical. Descent
being on my view
the hidden bond of connexion which naturalists have been seeking under the term of the natural
system. On this view we can understand how it is that, in the eyes of most naturalists,
the structure of the embryo is even more important for classification than that of the adult. For the embryo is the animal in its less modified state;
|